记录mysql性能查询过程的使用方法 |
本文标签:mysql,性能 一切源于一个实验,请看下面的例子: 表: 复制代码 代码如下: CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `foo` ( `a` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `b` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, `c` varchar(100) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`a`), KEY `bar` (`b`,`a`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB; CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `foo2` ( `a` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `b` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, `c` varchar(100) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`a`), KEY `bar` (`b`,`a`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM; 我往两个表中插入了30w的数据(插入的时候性能差别InnoDB比MyISAM慢) 复制代码 代码如下: <?php $host = 192.168.100.166; $dbName = test; $user = root; $password = ; $db = mysql_connect($host, $user, $password) or die(DB connect failed); mysql_select_db($dbName, $db); echo ===================InnoDB======================= . "\r\n"; $start = microtime(true); mysql_query("SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS * FROM foo WHERE b = 1 LIMIT 1000, 10"); $end = microtime(true); echo $end - $start . "\r\n"; echo ===================MyISAM======================= . "\r\n"; $start = microtime(true); mysql_query("SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS * FROM foo2 WHERE b = 1 LIMIT 1000, 10"); $end = microtime(true); echo $end - $start . "\r\n"; 返回结果:
首先是使用explain来进行查看 确定两边都没有使用index,第二个查询查的rows,并且MyISAM的查询rows还比InnoDB少这么多,反而是查询慢于InnoDB!!这Y的有点奇怪 。
没事,还有一个牛掰工具profile 具体使用可以参考:http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/show-profile.html 使用方法简单来说: 复制代码 代码如下: Mysql > set profiling = 1; Mysql>show profiles; Mysql>show profile for query 1; ![]() 这个数据中就可以看到MyISAM的Sending data比InnoDB的Sending data费时太多了 。查看mysql文档 http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/general-thread-states.html
Sending data The thread is reading and processing rows for a SELECT statement, and sending data to the client. Because operations occurring during this this state tend to perform large amounts of disk access (reads), it is often the longest-running state over the lifetime of a given query. Sending data是去磁盘中读取select的结果,然后将结果返回给客户端 。这个过程会有大量的IO操作 。你可以使用show profile cpu for query XX;来进行查看,发现MyISAM的CPU_system比InnnoDB大很多 。至此可以得出结论是MyISAM进行表查询(区别仅仅使用索引就可以完成的查询)比InnoDB慢 。 |